Pascal Meis vs Pirmin Haenle Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L W W L
Form
W L W W L L L W L LHead-To-Head: Meis 2 - 0 Haenle
They have played 6 sets in total, with Meis winning 4 and Haenle winning 2. The last match between Meis and Haenle was at the Italy F4, 04-04-2016, First, I.hard with Pascal Meis getting the victory 4-6 6-3 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pascal Meis | 2 |
| Pirmin Haenle | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Pascal Meis
Player
Pirmin Haenle
72%
(
85 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
43 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
| 6-3 2-6 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 31 | Games Won | 28 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:28:30 | Average Match Time | 1:28:30 |
| 72% (85/118) | 1st Serve % | 60% (66/110) |
| 71% (60/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (49/66) |
| 45% (15/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (20/44) |
| 25% (3/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 37% (41/110) | Return Points Win % | 36% (43/118) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pascal Meis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Pascal Meis
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pascal Meis
Player
Louroi Martinez
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 7-5 10-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pascal Meis
Player
Tim Ruehl
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrien Burdet
Player
Pascal Meis
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Staeheli
Player
Pascal Meis
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Pascal Meis
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pascal Meis
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pascal Meis
Player
Marco Migliorati
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Pascal Meis
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
4
Total Points Won
8
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Pirmin Haenle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Propoggia
Player
Pirmin Haenle
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brydan Klein
Player
Pirmin Haenle
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Ruikai Wang
59%
(
73 of
123)
1st Serve %
50%
(
56 of
112)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
43 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
128
Total Points Won
107
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tejas Chaukulkar
Player
Pirmin Haenle
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Pirmin Haenle
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Pirmin Haenle
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
39%
(
27 of
69)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth
Player
Pirmin Haenle
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (218/201) | Win/Loss | 41% (191/277) |
| 53% (496/442) | Sets Win/Loss | 43% (464/618) |
| 52% (4393/4107) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (4855/5293) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 667 | Aces Total | 172 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 465 | Total Double Faults | 339 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 535.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 534.62 |
| 62% (9272/14905) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3215/5105) |
| 65% (6018/9272) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2084/3215) |
| 52% (2937/5633) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (778/1890) |
| 42% (651/1550) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (188/426) |
| 40% (5954/14724) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1841/4867) |
| 53% (215/407) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (187/462) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (43/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (62/146) |
| 45% (49/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (65/150) |
| 82% (239/197) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (197/159) |
| 18% (239/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (197/38) |
| 12% (180/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (271/32) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
